IT Donation to Facilitate Telemedicine Consultations – Low Risk of Fraud says OIG
The Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued Advisory Opinion No. 18-03 in support of an arrangement where a federally qualified health center look-alike (the “Provider”) would donate free information technology-related equipment and services to a county health clinic (the “County Clinic”) to facilitate telemedicine encounters with the County Clinic’s patients (the “Proposed Arrangement”). The OIG concluded that although the Proposed Arrangement could potentially generate prohibited remuneration under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”) and Civil Monetary Penalties Law (“CMPL”) with the requisite intent to induce or reward referrals of federal health care programs, the OIG would exercise its discretion and not sanction the Provider or the County Clinic (collectively the “Requestors”).
The OIG’s analysis and conclusion of the Proposed Arrangement provides new insight into the government’s position on these type of donations that facilitate telemedicine encounters. Specifically, how the government views these type of donations with the continued expansion of coverage and reimbursement of telemedicine services under federal health care programs. The Advisory Opinion indicates support for the development of collaborative telemedicine affiliations and that the potential remuneration from the future referrals can be outweighed by the access to health care services and benefits actually received by rural or remote communities.
The County Clinic is a division of the County Department of Health that furnishes certain confidential sexually transmitted infection testing, treatment and counseling. The Provider has an existing referral relationship with the County Clinic but the facilities are separated by about 80 miles making it difficult for patients to access the Provider. Under the Proposed Arrangement, the Provider would donate information technology-related equipment and services to the County Clinic to facilitate telemedicine encounters between the Provider and the County Clinic’s patients for certain HIV prevention and treatment services. The Provider would cover the costs of the equipment, its set up, and maintenance through grant-funding from the State Department of Health. The Provider would bill the Medicare program for the professional services delivered in the telemedicine encounters. The County Clinic would house the equipment and bill the state Medicaid program an originating site fee related to the telemedicine encounters. The originating site is not required to provide any personnel or equipment in order to bill for the facility fee (Q3014) (which is only a coverage requirement to provide the telehealth consult).
Stark Law, Anti- Kickback Statute, M S O Structures, Telehealth, Physician Compensation, and Ancillary Services Recent False Claims Act Cases in the Health Care Industry: Key Takeaways for Providers Navigating False Claims Act Liability and Damages— The Importance of Compliance Programs for Healthcare Providers F D A Guidelines on A I Technologies in Medical Devices Agency Law Considerations for A I in Healthcare H I P A A Breach Risk Assessments Require Information- Focused Analysis What H I P A A Policies are Required for a Health Care Provider? - 🎙️
Companion Episode Transcript: A S C Compliance Checklist for 2026 Fee- Splitting Risks in Telehealth – Impacts on Telemedicine Structures C P O M in Telehealth: What the Corporate Practice of Medicine Means for Virtual Care Companies A S C Safe Harbors and Physician Investors in A S Cs: Managing Lower- Volume Owners How Artificial Intelligence is Changing the Medical Profession A S C Safe Harbors: The Silent Partner Physician and Compliance Pitfalls Podcast – The Ambulatory Surgery Center Safe Harbors – General Overview Podcast Episode 2: An Overview of the Stark Law & New Developments